Archive for July, 2010

Petaluma Police Escalate from Impounds to Arrests

Tuesday, July 27th, 2010

originally published at: www.pressdemocrat.com

Petaluma checkpoints net 3 DUI suspects

By MARTIN ESPINOZA
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

Published: Saturday, July 24, 2010 at 9:59 a.m.

Petaluma police arrested and cited 10 drivers during two DUI and driver’s license checkpoints Friday night. Three of the arrests were for drunk driving.

The first checkpoint was staged on Old Redwood Highway near the North McDowell Extension between 6 and 9 p.m., and the second was held from 11 p.m. until 2 a.m. on Petaluma Boulevard North near Gossage Avenue.

The stops are part of a series of at least 10 checkpoints, held mostly on weekends in Santa Rosa, Petaluma and Cotati, since March.

Of the 1,534 vehicles that passed through the two checkpoints, 1,494 were screened by officers for signs of DUI and driver’s license violations. Sixty-nine drivers were directed to nearby parking areas for further evaluation.

In addition to the three arrested for DUI, one driver was arrested for driving on a suspended license and three others were arrested for driving without having been issued a license. One person was cited for having an expired driver’s license and another person was arrested for an outstanding stolen vehicle warrant. One person was arrested for possession of marijuana in his car.

In the most serious DUI arrest, police reported that Shawn Kristoffer Cahoon, 34, of Rohnert Park entered the first checkpoint at about 6:28 p.m. with a blood alcohol level almost three times the legal limit.

Officers screening drivers detected the odor of alcohol and Cahoon displayed signs of intoxication, police said.

He was on probation for a previous DUI in February 2008. The terms of his probation require that he not drive a vehicle with alcohol in his blood and that he not refuse to take a blood alcohol test. Cahoon refused to take a chemical test and was booked into Sonoma County Jail for violating probation, officials said. His bail was set at $10,000.

A total of seven vehicles were towed and four were impounded for 30 days because the drivers either did not have a driver’s license or were driving on a suspended license.

The 30-day impound rule often affects illegal immigrants because California law does not allow them to obtain a state driver’s license.

As in previous checkpoints, about a half-dozen activists stationed themselves ahead of the police stop point. They warned drivers by holding signs that read, “Reten, Reten,” which is the Spanish word for checkpoint.

The program, funded through a state grant, involves 13 law enforcement agencies in Sonoma County and is coordinated by the Petaluma Police Department.

Rohnert Park Public Safety in Disarray

Tuesday, July 27th, 2010

originally published at http://www.pressdemocrat.com

Rohnert Park fire commander says agency is in disarray

By JEREMY HAY
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

Published: Monday, July 26, 2010 at 6:01 p.m.

The Rohnert Park Public Safety Department is in disarray, its fire division commander said Monday.

The division lacks support from managers and the City Council, it is hampered by senior officers resistant to change, and it is beset by low morale, Fire Commander Jack Rosevear said.

“The department’s in crisis,” said Rosevear, who took over the fire division in June 2008 and plans to run for City Council this year. “I’m not exaggerating. It’s not a matter of perspective, it’s the truth.”

Rosevear, who has said he will retire in August partly to save the jobs of younger firefighters facing potential layoffs, made his concerns known in an unusually public manner, delivering a statement to The Press Democrat and the weekly Community Voice newspaper.

He said his motive is to shed light on problems within the department — which provides both police and fire services — and lay the groundwork for necessary improvements.

“I’m not after payback, retribution, vengeance, anything like that. I’m after success,” he said.

City officials unanimously rejected the substance of Rosevear’s concerns, but were varied in their reactions, expressing responses ranging from irritation to bewilderment to praise of his performance.

“This is all a personnel issue that he’s putting in public,” said Mayor Pam Stafford. “This council doesn’t deal with disgruntled employees, that’s not our purview.”

Public Safety Director Brian Masterson, Rosevear’s boss, said, “Jack did a good job for us…he made some positive changes and I would say he was supported by all the members of public safety.”

He added: “I’m a big believer that people have the right to express their opinions however they want to do it and certainly Jack has voiced his.”

Vice-Mayor Gina Belforte said, “I can honestly say I don’t know what he’s talking about…I haven’t had any reason to believe there’s been a problem with fire.”

In his statement, Rosevear said the city’s firefighters and police officers are “the finest and most courageous” he’s ever worked with, then laid out a blistering catalogue of charges. They include:

– “A small group of senior police officers” have tried to undermine him through a steady whispering campaign because they resent changes he made that reduced their overtime;

– City leaders and Masterson prioritize police services over fire services;

– Budget-related decisions or proposals — particularly related to layoffs — made by city leaders and supported by Masterson have contributed to low morale within the division.

Rosevear said younger firefighters have left or are planning to leave the department because they fear being laid off. And he said he was told twice since June 2009 that he would be laid off, which firefighters opposed because they thought it would hurt the division.

He said Masterson supported that proposal by then-City Manager Dan Schwarz, illustrating how police services are favored over fire services.

“At Rohnert Park, law enforcement is the dominant arm. Everything comes secondary to that, including fire,” Rosevear said. “So if there are decisions to be made, law enforcement staffing would be weighed first before fire.”

Masterson disputed that on several counts.

“I didn’t support laying off anybody,” he stated, while also saying that layoffs were an understandable recourse for a city teetering on bankruptcy.

Masterson said he transferred police officers to the fire division in early 2009, a plan implemented with Rosevear’s support. Since then, more police officers have been laid off than firefighters, he said.

“We’re not in a crisis,” Masterson said. “We were in a state of flux last year because we weren’t sure what was going to happen. It was stressful for everyone.”

Asked whether Rosevear’s statements surprised her, Stafford suggested the fire commander was playing politics.

“You know, he’s running for City Council, of course,” said Stafford, who is running for re-election.

“If there was not a council seat open I would be speaking out in this same manner,” Rosevear said. “I’m only running because I see a pending disaster, and I have been personally caught up in the disaster as an employee and as a resident.”

Stafford said Rosevear is alone in his concerns.

“Personally, I don’t think his position reflects the department, I think it reflects him,” she said.

PACH opposes Arizona State Senate Bill 1070

Friday, July 16th, 2010

The state of Arizona is poised to begin enforcing SB1070 on July 29th. PACH encourages everyone to protest and resist this law. We have endorsed the march organized by IMPACT and MEChA on July 29th in Petaluma at McDowell Park at 6pm.

Please read the following statement from our board member Elbert “Big Man” Howard on the Arizona law.

New Immigration Law: Capitalism & Immigration = Fascism
By Elbert “Big Man” Howard

Arizona’s newly-passed law, SB 1070, firstly, allows police officers to subjectively determine what race they think a person is along with how poorly a command of the English language they believe the person has.

Secondly, this law allows these law enforcement officers at will, based on these racist methods, to stop, detain, harass, question, demand identification, and then decide whether or not the person is in the USA illegally.

The state “bosses” and institutions who control the police have decided it is now perfectly legal to completely ignore a person’s constitutional and human rights by taking into account such racist nonsense as a person’s skin color, type of clothing worn, and even the number of people in a car.
According to this law, the police can now legally harass day laborers and the people who seek to hire them.

This is legalized racial profiling of Latinos as well as African Americans and these violations of human rights have been included in Arizona’s state police training materials and these enforcement guidelines will be distributed to 15,000 Arizona state officers when SB 1070 is set to become absolute law effective July 29th, 2010.

The weak-kneed Obama administration, which spit out lip service concerning immigration reform so as to get the Latino vote, now has abandoned and turned its back on these people and abandoned them. This is no different than the practice of previous administrations which did the exact same thing to African Americans seeking voting, civil and human rights.

Once again, we are faced with a Federal and State government political football game – a dangerous, expensive game costing not only money (“our tax dollars at work!”) but one which threatens massive civil unrest and invites violence.

What these appointed governmental “bosses” most worry about is losing their jobs (licenses to steal from the people) and they understand that by implementing these vicious and racist practices, thereby satiating the fearful elite in Arizona, they may be able to stay in office a little longer.

This reign of terror that is being imposed on the Hispanic and African American communities can be turned in the other direction, against these fearful, racist law-makers (AKA law-breakers).
HOW?
ORGANIZE!
DOOR TO DOOR, STREET TO STREET, BLOCK TO BLOCK!
Everyone able to vote must register and then vote to remove those who create these laws, who practice racism, and who are trying to deprive people of their constitutional and human rights.
We must remove those who refuse to serve the needs and desires of all in our communities.

To achieve this, we must join in solidarity with all our brothers and sisters of all ages, across all ethnic, racial, and gender lines. We must all speak out, loudly and clearly, and let our so-called leaders know that we will not stand idly by, and they will not be re-elected, as long as racist laws like these are allowed to be put into practice.

Solidarity is the key to unity, and in unity there is power.

Power to the People.

Elbert “Big Man” Howard
Forestville, California
July 12th, 2010

Next PACH Meeting

Friday, July 16th, 2010

Please join us for our next meeting on Tuesday August 10th at 7pm.

We meet at 719 Orchard St, Santa Rosa, CA 95404. We can be reached at 707-542-7224 or info@pachline.org.

Police Killings

Friday, July 16th, 2010

THE SILENCE MUST END!

The veil of secrecy must be lifted. Timely, full disclosure of information will restore public confidence in the integrity of the incident, investigation and the department. The voices of those who died at the hands of Sonoma County law enforcement, have been stilled following a 1999 recommendation of the U.S. Civil Rights Commission Advisory Commission for a CIVILIAN REVIEW BOARD:

1. Philip Medina, 48, January 17, 2000 in custody Sonoma County Sheriff
2. James Curran, 51, March 19, 2000 in custody Sonoma County Sheriff
3. Erin Colleen McDonald, 31, April 20, 2000 shot five times Windsor Police
4. Todd Eugene Dieterle, 37, May, 2000 shot seven times SRJC Police
5. Robert Comacho, 35, May 5, 2000 shot Rohnert Park Police
6. Patrick McLoughlin, 19, October 23, 2001 gunfire exchange Petaluma Police
7. Luis Solaro Gonzalez, 23, February 28, 2002 in custody Sonoma County Sheriff
8. Thomas John Connelly, 49, May 8, 2002 in custody Sonoma County Sheriff
9. Serena Roxanne Case, 32, January 16, 2003 in custody Sonoma County Sheriff
10. Keith Thompson Suite, 42, April 8, 2003 in custody Sonoma County Sheriff
11. Seth Micha Warde, 22, July 10, 2003 traffic stop CHP
12. Anthony Zakharoff, 49, July 27, 2003 in custody Sonoma County Sheriff
13. Michael William Behringh, 52, November 18, 2003 in custody Sonoma County Sheriff
14. Joseph A. Peay, 35, September 18, 2004 shot 10 times Sheriff/CHP
15. Kenneth Hugh Duncan, 62, November 11, 2004 shot nine times Sonoma County Sheriff
16. April Hanlon 35, November 25, 2004 gunfire Sonoma County Sheriff
17. Terry Lee Grinner, Jr., 30, January 25, 2005 shot twice Rohnert Park Police
18. Carlos Casillas Fernandez, 31, July 16, 2005 tasered 6x Santa Rosa Police
19. James Anthony DeCosta, 72, October 1, 2005 shot 27 times Petaluma Police
20. James Richard Nace, 42, December 10, 2005 shot Sonoma County Sheriff
21. Moses McDowell, 29, November 6, 2006 in custody Sonoma County Sheriff
22. Haki Thurston, 22, February 23, 2007 shot 27 times Santa Rosa SWAT
23. Jeremiah Chass, 16, March 12, 2007 shot 8 times Sonoma County Sheriff
24. Richard DeSantis, 30, April 9, 2007 shot twice Santa Rosa Police
25. Walter L. Heller, 55, April 22, 2007 tasered twice Petaluma Police
26. Luis Felipe Sanchez, 27, May 4, 2007 shot 21 times Sonoma County Sheriff
27. Richard Lamont Williamson, 54, June 17, 2007 in custody Sonoma County Sheriff
28. Ryan George, 22, July 9, 2007 in custody Sonoma County Sheriff
29. William Townsley, 46, September 24, 2007 in custody Sonoma County Sheriff
30. James Marrufo, 48, December 1, 2007 in custody Sonoma County Sheriff
31. Jesse Hamilton, 24, January 2, 2008 shot Santa Rosa Police
32. Samuel Castillo-Martinez, 36, March 13, 2008 in custody Sonoma County Sheriff
33. Heather Smith-Billings, 31, March 16, 2008 shot Rohnert Park Police
34. Leonardo Pacheco, 39, April 21, 2008 in custody Sonoma County Sheriff
35. Guy James Fernandez, 52, November 9, 2008 stun gun Rohnert Park Police
36. Craig Von Dohlen 37, December 7, 2008 shot Sonoma County Sheriff
37. Nathan B Vaughn, 39, December 20, 2008 tasered 3x Sonoma County Sheriff
38. Jon Gerald Moore, 44, September 18, 2009 in custody Sonoma County Sheriff
39. Teresa Ellen Hagan, 49, January 21, 2010 in custody Sonoma County Sheriff
40. Albert Mike Leday, Jr, 49, June 1, 2010 shot 3x Sonoma County Sheriff

a printable version of this list is here

Cop Vs Bike

Friday, July 16th, 2010

Bicyclist hit by Santa Rosa police car

By MARY CALLAHAN
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

Published: Thursday, July 15, 2010 at 8:24 a.m.

A bicyclist who was struck by a Santa Rosa policeman on Highway 12 late Wednesday night crossed from the eastbound bike lane in front of the officer’s car in an effort to turn left, officials said.

Dylan Debiase, 18, broke his baby toe and suffered scrapes and abrasions in the 10 p.m. collision at Boas Drive, police Lt. Ben Harlin said.

The officer, Eric Rhodes, a traffic investigator and DUI enforcement officer, was responding to a call about a suspected drunken driver on eastbound Highway 12 and was headed eastbound himself when Debiase crossed in front of him to turn onto Boas Drive, Harlin said.

Rhodes was in a marked police car, but Harlin said he did not believe his lights or siren were activated.

He said Debiase, who has a Highway 12 address, was in a marked bike lane before he crossed into the two eastbound car lanes.

Rhodes moved left to try to avoid the bike but they collided anyway, Harlin said.

Debiase was taken to an area hospital for treatment and later released, police said.

Authorities, meanwhile, closed down the eastbound lanes of Highway 12 into the early morning hours of Thursday to investigate and are still seeking witnesses, Harlin said.

Anyone who saw the incident is asked to call the Santa Rosa Police Department’s Traffic Bureau at (707) 543-3600

Petaluma Cops Get an RV

Friday, July 16th, 2010

originally published at www.pressdemocrat.com

Huge new police vehicle turns heads

By DAN JOHNSON,
ARGUS-COURIER STAFF

Published: Thursday, July 8, 2010 at 12:00 p.m.

The sudden appearance of a huge, new police vehicle at various spots in Petaluma may have some people wondering if the Petaluma Police Department has decided to close up its building and go completely mobile.

“Actually, if our police department building fell to the ground, we could run it from this new vehicle,” said Lt. Mike Cook. “It is a mobile command center, and can be used for any disaster emergencies and at all checkpoints we conduct.”

It also can be used during critical situations involving SWAT and hostage/crisis negotiators as well as during special events to promote public safety, and to help with crowd and traffic control.

The vehicle was designed to be a fully functional regional command, control and communications center for Petaluma and the Avoid the 13 Sonoma County DUI Task Force. It is equipped with telephones, multimedia systems, radios, computers and other specialized equipment that help to ensure public safety.

It cost a whopping $450,000, but the city didn’t have to pay a penny for it. The funding breakdown was: $260,000 from a California Office of Traffic Safety Avoid the 13 DUI grant and other OTS grants; $140,000 from the police department’s asset-seizure funds; $40,000 from an annual Homeland Security grant; and $10,000 from the Petaluma Police Officer Association’s Hostage Negotiation Golf Fund account.

The police department was able to obtain a large portion of the money because it is the lead agency for the regional DUI enforcement efforts in Sonoma County to reduce alcohol-related fatalities and injuries, as well as increase public awareness of problems associated with drinking and driving.

The vehicle, which was obtained about two months ago, has created quite a stir.

“We brought it to the Butter & Egg Days Parade, and it generated a lot of positive comments,” Cook said.

Grant money also has enabled the police department to recently purchase four other vehicles — a Chevrolet pickup for commercial-vehicle enforcement ($53,000), a Chevrolet Tahoe for its K-9 program ($50,000), and a mobile pet-adoption trailer ($35,000) and a pickup ($32,000) for its Animal Services division.

The commercial-enforcement pickup and K-9 vehicle were funded by American Investment and Recovery Act grants, while the PETCO Foundation supplied money for the pet-adoption trailer and Animal Services pickup.

“The pickup will be used for education and enforcement involving large trucks,” Cook said.

Jeff Charter, the manager of the Petaluma Animal Shelter & Adoption Center, applied for the grant for the trailer after a pilot program to increase pet adoptions was successful. In 2009, the animal shelter began displaying animals up for adoption at the Petaluma PETCO store, and allowed them to interact with customers. They are housed at the store and taken care of by volunteers.

This increased public exposure helped to increase the number of animals adopted into good homes.

The mobile-adoption trailer will build open the success of the program by allowing animal shelter workers to bring animals up for adoption to special events and thereby enable more of them to be shown to the public.

“We have found that taking the animals to the public reaches people who might not otherwise consider adopting or make a special trip to the center,” Charter said. “The exposure is great for the animals, and allows us to pair adoptable animals with good homes.

“We are very thankful to PETCO for the donation that will allow us to continue this program.”

Concerned Petaluman Documents Police Excess and Failure

Friday, July 16th, 2010

originally published at www.watchsonomacounty.com

Petaluma crusader wants an honest town

BY LORI A. CARTER
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

John Hanania is on a crusade.

Yet another crusade, his critics say.

The Petaluma resident has been hounding city leaders for two years about what he calls a double standard in the Police Department’s enforcement of illegally tinted vehicle windows.

At the same time regular motorists are cited for the traffic infraction, several Police Department employees flout the law, driving their personal vehicles with after-market darkened front windows, he said.

“It’s not right,” he said recently just outside the department’s fenced parking lot, where several vehicles sported dimmed front windows in violation of the state’s vehicle code.

Hanania can point out multiple violations on city employees’ personal vehicles: lack of a front license plate, covered plates, missing mud flaps and more.

“Why is it that they allow this stuff to continue without tickets when they give the public citations?” he said. “I don’t like abuse of power.”

For the past few months, Hanania has engaged in a written back-and-forth with interim police Chief Danny Fish about his complaints. He has spoken at City Council meetings, called the city manager and met with police on several occasions. He has met with city council members dozens of times over the years.

Capt. Dave Sears said last week that his department has given its employees a deadline to fix their vehicles. No one has been cited.

“It’s a minor infraction. Our people who had those vehicles not in compliance, we asked them to take care of it,” he said. “Most of them have gotten it fixed. Some need some time.”

Sears said officers often give citizens a warning for violating the statute, which says the front driver’s and passenger windows cannot be covered by any film. Nine motorists were cited for the violation in March and April.

This battle isn’t the first for Hanania. His quarrels with the way the city does business go back at least 16 years, through more than half a dozen city managers and police chiefs.

In 1994, he fought a traffic ticket he got for what police said was an illegal left turn. He won in court and it sparked Hanania’s indignation.

In 1997 and 1998, he stood up against a proposal to install surveillance cameras in downtown’s Putnam Plaza, arguing the move was unfair to teenagers. The city increased police patrols but declined to put up cameras.

In 2003, he led a crusade against junked cars, recreational vehicles, boats and trailers being left on city streets past the three-day limit. The City Council voted twice to tighten enforcement of such eyesores.

Hanania also has been the target of police action. Disagreements with a neighbor led to vehicles owned by both families being towed, although Hanania maintains his were towed improperly.

Hanania filed a small claims lawsuit against the city on May 3, demanding the towing fees be returned. He parks several vehicles in the cul-de-sac where he lives and tries to move the vehicles around before they are ticketed, he said.

Some city employees say privately that his latest complaints are an effort to pressure the city to refund the towing fees. Hanania has filed a series of Public Records Act requests seeking police records on citations, among other things.

“I have a great deal of respect for a lot of the police,” he said. “But what they are doing isn’t right.”

One city councilman has come under Hanania’s fire. He said the front windows of Mike Harris’ car have been modified. Harris said he doesn’t know if they are illegally tinted.

“I have no idea,” he said. “I’m not a car guy. If they are, I’ll have them checked and have them fixed.

“I’ve spoken to John probably 50 times in the last seven years I’ve been on the council. John is a good guy and I enjoy my discussions with him,” Harris said. He declined to comment further because of the recent claim against the city. The small claims suit is scheduled for a hearing next month.

People Resist Racist Checkpoints

Friday, July 16th, 2010

originally published at www.watchsonomacounty.com

Protesters warn drivers of police checkpoints in Santa Rosa and Petaluma

By GUY KOVNER

THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

Opponents of police vehicle impoundment practices are hitting the streets, intent on warning motorists of police checkpoints in Santa Rosa and Petaluma.

Protesters holding signs in Spanish will continue to show up at checkpoints to protest 30-day impoundments of vehicles operated by drivers without valid licenses, said Alicia Roman, a Santa Rosa attorney who is a member of the Committee for Immigrant Rights.

The cost of reclaiming an impounded auto, typically $2,000, places an “undue hardship” on low-income people, including Latino immigrants, she said.

“People are upset this is going on,” Roman said.

Police officials, who have discussed the issue with Roman’s group and American Civil Liberties Union representatives, say the checkpoints are both legal and appropriate.

“I believe it is an effective strategy for making the streets safer,” said Santa Rosa Police Chief Tom Schwedhelm.

“There are consequences for not following the law,” he said, regarding the impoundments and cost of getting the car back.

Petaluma Police Sgt. Ken Savano, who coordinates checkpoints, acknowledged that the protesters are exercising their First Amendment right of free speech and may do so as long as they do not obstruct sidewalks or get in a roadway.

“They are taking a close look at law enforcement,” Savano said. “We don’t have any problem with that.”

But he also suggested that the protests might enable alcohol-impaired drivers, “who could kill any one of us,” to evade the checkpoints.

The police stops are intended to catch people driving under the influence, as well as motorists with suspended or revoked licenses and unlicensed drivers, he said.

The 30-day impound is applied only to drivers cited for license violations, Savano said, and keeps a vehicle “away from that driver for 30 days.”

Roman said the checkpoint protests are intended to warn Spanish-speaking drivers, including illegal immigrants whose status prohibits them from obtaining California driver’s licenses.

“We are not out there to help drunk drivers,” she said.

Amalia Greenberg Delgado, an ACLU attorney in San Francisco, said that the Santa Rosa checkpoints are netting substantially more driver’s license violations than DUI citations.

Santa Rosa police statistics, obtained by Roman, show that 5,277 vehicles were screened at checkpoints between December 2006 and June 2008, resulting in 96 vehicles towed for license violations and six DUI arrests.

Savano noted that DUI arrests in Petaluma increased 8 percent in 2009-10, while vehicle collisions are down 20 percent. They have dropped to the lowest level in 10 years, a trend he attributed largely to the checkpoints.

“It is absolutely worth it,” Savano said.

Rick Coshnear, a Santa Rosa attorney and member of the Committee for Immigration Rights, said police are blurring the distinction between drivers who have never had a license and those who are currently unlicensed but may have previously been licensed in Mexico, another state or in California before it ceased licensing undocumented immigrants.

The state law on vehicle impoundment applies to people whose licenses have been suspended, revoked or restricted or those “driving a vehicle without ever having been issued a driver’s license.”

It is likely, Coshnear said, that drivers “whose licenses have been suspended or revoked…are much more dangerous than those who do not currently have a valid license.”

Santa Rosa’s vehicle impound program was started in the mid-1990s in response to a spate of hit-and-run collisions and the finding that many who flee from a crash are unlicensed drivers, Schwedhelm said.

Numerous collisions still involve unlicensed and uninsured drivers who cause injuries and property damage, he said. “That’s the other side of the story,” Schwedhelm said.

Officers have discretion to avoid impounding vehicles for license violations, enabling the driver and occupants to get home safely by taxi or with a licensed driver, Schwedhelm said.

But an unlicensed driver cannot be allowed to drive away because that would expose the city to significant liability, he said.

“We are going to encourage our officers to impound,” Schwedhelm said.

The road would be safer, Savano said, if all residents — regardless of immigration status — were tested and licensed to drive, and required to carry insurance.

Such a decision is up to the Legislature, Schwedhelm said, agreeing that universal licensing “may help the situation.”

The ACLU has submitted to Santa Rosa a proposed impound policy that would prohibit towing away a safely parked vehicle, or if a licensed driver could retrieve it “in a reasonable time period.”

It would also allow, under some conditions, the vehicle to be towed to the driver’s home instead of an impoundment lot.

In a letter to the ACLU, Schwedhelm acknowledged receiving the proposed policy. Police are updating towing and impoundment policies and “will take your recommendations into consideration,” the chief wrote.

Petaluma’s next checkpoints will be on FridayJuly 16 and July 23. Santa Rosa’s next effort will be Labor Day weekend.

You can reach Staff Writer Guy Kovner at 521-5457 or guy.kovner@pressdemocrat.com.

Funston Has Shot Twice Before

Friday, July 16th, 2010

originally published at www.pressdemocrat.com

Deputy involved in June 2 shooting involved in two other shootings

By JEREMY HAY
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

Published: Monday, July 5, 2010 at 5:32 p.m.

The Sonoma County Sheriff’s deputy who shot and killed a man last month in Santa Rosa has been involved in three of the 11 officer-involved shootings that the sheriff’s office has recorded this decade.

Sgt. Mark Fuston, who on June 1 killed Albert Mike Leday Jr., 49, after a high speed chase, was one of two deputies who fatally shot a Windsor woman in 2000 after she pointed a toy gun at them. In 2003, he shot and injured a fleeing gang member.

A Santa Rosa Police Department investigation continues into the Leday shooting. Fuston was cleared of wrongdoing in the prior two shooting incidents.

Civil rights activists on Monday said they were withholding judgement but said that the prior shootings were notable.

“It doesn’t bode well,” sad Carole Howard, a member of the Police Accountability Clinic and Helpline, a group that works with people who feel mistreated by police. “It’s just one more thing to pay attention to, it’s an alert, put it that way.”

Steve Fabian, a boardmember of the county chapter of the ACLU, said, “It’s hard to second guess a police officer in this type of situation without knowing all the things that took place, both in the current situation and the prior situations.”

He added, however, “I think that at the same time, three shootings — most officers go through their career with no shootings — it just raises a lot of concerns.”

Sheriff’s officials last week said that deputies involved in multiple shootings aren’t subject to additional supervision, but that the department reviews each incident to see whether procedures were followed.

On Monday, Sheriff’s Capt. Matt McCaffrey said that those reviews do take into account prior incidents where there was use of force.

“You look at what were your findings in the previous shootings, if he followed policy, he followed law, he followed good judgment. If your findings were positive, there’s nothing really to go back and look at,” he said.

“Our point of view is to look at it internally to see if they followed procedure, and the second issue is to look at it from a training standpoint,” McCaffrey said. “That’s our job as an agency.”

Fuston is not the only deputy to have been involved in multiple shootings. In 2004, Deputy Henri Boustany was involved in two fatal shootings; he was cleared of wrongdoing in both cases.

Of the 11 officer-involved shootings recorded by the sheriff’s office since 2000, eight were fatal.

The first of those was in April 2000, and involved Fuston and another deputy, Tom Howard. In that case, the two were responding to a 911 call from Erin McDonald, 31, who said she was being held hostage by a woman with a gun.

In the house, McDonald pointed a cap gun that had been painted black at each of them separately, prompting them to fire.

Both were cleared of wrongdoing, and the District Attorney’s Office later concluded that McDonald “orchestrated” a “suicide-by-cop plan.”

In the 2003 shooting, Fuston shot Andrew Valencia, 21, five times in the back, buttocks and legs after pulling him over. In that case, Santa Rosa and Petaluma police investigators said, Valencia turned as Fuston was chasing him, appeared to be drawing a weapon and shouted, “I have a gun, too.”

No weapon was found on Valencia, who survived, but a loaded 9 mm handgun was found in his car. Valencia was later sentenced to more than 30 years in prison for a gang-related shooting.

The shooting of Leday came after a pursuit that began at a Larkfield apartment complex to which deputies had been called by a woman who said she was fearful of her ex-boyfriend who was on the premises, and that he had earlier assaulted her.

When deputies spotted Leday in his car, he led them on a chase to Guerneville Road and West Steele Lane, where he crashed into a light pole and got out of his car.

He was shot seconds later, police and some witnesses said, after he appeared to reach behind his back and pull up his waistband.

No weapon was found on Leday or at the scene.

The case remains under investigation by Santa Rosa Police investigators who will turn over their findings to the District Attorneys Office to determine if there was any criminal wrongdoing.